<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>upward spiral &#187; kuler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kshipra.info/tag/kuler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kshipra.info</link>
	<description>kshipra&#039;s online repository</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Adobe Kuler and ColourLovers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kshipra.info/2008/04/adobe-kuler-and-colourloverscom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kshipra.info/2008/04/adobe-kuler-and-colourloverscom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kshipra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interaction Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colourlovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kuler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kshipra.info/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Came across this topic that talked about Kuler being ripped off from ColourLovers.com I am not being biased with any group but i think both the interfaces do not match each other and their interactions are totally different. I  first &#8230; <a href="http://www.kshipra.info/2008/04/adobe-kuler-and-colourloverscom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>Came across this topic that talked about Kuler being ripped off from <a href="http://www.colourlovers.com/blog/2007/07/06/for-the-record-adobe-kuler-vs-colourlovers/" target="_blank">ColourLovers.com<br />
</a>I am not being biased with any group but i think both the interfaces do not match each other and their interactions are totally different.</p>
<p>I  first started out with Abobe Kuler, got the hang of creating themes sooner than ColourLovers.com<br />
ColourLover.com seemed more community based with lot of things happening, which i really didnt have time to check out.</p>
<p>I just needed to create combinations and deploy them on my design at work and the time factor matters!!<br />
Whenever i have some time or a break, i go back to re-edit the name and tags at Kuler.</p>
<p>I agree with the differences (comments) stated by <a href="http://gfxcomplex.com/" target="_blank">Josh Chernoff</a> on <a href="http://visualrinse.com/2007/07/07/adobe-ripped-off-a-blogger-to-create-kuler/" target="_blank">Chad Udell</a> &#8216;s site that:</p>
<ol>
<li> colourlovers is more community based. forums and blogging and a better commenting rating system</li>
<li> Kuler is more technical and logical. Provides CMYK, LAB and RGB with color theories and a over all a better color wheel).</li>
<li> Kuler is more API friendly with a great deal of redevelopment emphasis.</li>
<li> The web technologies are different. Kulers was in a way to provides a better understanding of Action Script’s capabilities as kuler surfaced just about the same time AS3 was introduced.</li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kshipra.info/2008/04/adobe-kuler-and-colourloverscom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

